I must confess, that it opened my eyes to understand the meaning at all. But of course, nor Chet Baker, nor the ultra-prominent broadway-songwriter-duo Lorenz Hart / Richard Rodgers were women. So, I doubt anyway, if it is really true, that it is written from the feminine viewpoint really. But the address towards a man is very credible for me too. Or even nonunderstandable really, else.
I must confess, that it opened my eyes to understand the meaning at all. But of course, nor Chet Baker, nor the ultra-prominent broadway-songwriter-duo Lorenz Hart / Richard Rodgers were women. So, I doubt anyway, if it is really true, that it is written from the feminine viewpoint really. But the address towards a man is very credible for me too. Or even nonunderstandable really, else.
The original meaning of the songtext is maybe targetted homo-erotic or simply non-erotic, what works for me perfectly too. It's irrelevant in my eyes, as love isn't erotic exclusive. And the erotic side of the love isn't forcely a theme to talk about public, as it is very private.
The song talks maybe even exactly of the incredible fruitful and prominent partnership of the composer Rodgers with the lyricist Hart in base.
The artworks of general validity with a concrete base in the real life are always-better, isn't it? Or, at least often-better, as it is frequently less stilted-artificially and fetched-hereby-from-far-away.
The song was covered mostly by men. Yet... It is a song written from a woman's perspective.
It's possibly, the moment she fell in love.
Most men never understand when their better half falls in love with them...and when they are told...they scratch their head.
@tebdanner
@tebdanner
That's an interesting viewpoint.
That's an interesting viewpoint.
I must confess, that it opened my eyes to understand the meaning at all. But of course, nor Chet Baker, nor the ultra-prominent broadway-songwriter-duo Lorenz Hart / Richard Rodgers were women. So, I doubt anyway, if it is really true, that it is written from the feminine viewpoint really. But the address towards a man is very credible for me too. Or even nonunderstandable really, else.
I must confess, that it opened my eyes to understand the meaning at all. But of course, nor Chet Baker, nor the ultra-prominent broadway-songwriter-duo Lorenz Hart / Richard Rodgers were women. So, I doubt anyway, if it is really true, that it is written from the feminine viewpoint really. But the address towards a man is very credible for me too. Or even nonunderstandable really, else.
The original meaning of the songtext is maybe targetted homo-erotic or simply non-erotic, what works for me perfectly too. It's irrelevant in my eyes, as love isn't erotic exclusive. And the erotic side of the love isn't forcely a theme to talk about public, as it is very private.
The song talks maybe even exactly of the incredible fruitful and prominent partnership of the composer Rodgers with the lyricist Hart in base.
The artworks of general validity with a concrete base in the real life are always-better, isn't it? Or, at least often-better, as it is frequently less stilted-artificially and fetched-hereby-from-far-away.