I can know thats the wrong interpretation because nothing in the song would make you think that. Its a pretty simple and obvious interpretation. And your right some songs are open for interpretation but some are just obvious. This being one of them. Its not about two different people, its about love and hate they are just personified. And when love is gone hate is there. You can gather that because of what hate is up to while love is gone. Then when love returns we see a complete 180 in hate and hes apologetic and loving once again. Another...
I can know thats the wrong interpretation because nothing in the song would make you think that. Its a pretty simple and obvious interpretation. And your right some songs are open for interpretation but some are just obvious. This being one of them. Its not about two different people, its about love and hate they are just personified. And when love is gone hate is there. You can gather that because of what hate is up to while love is gone. Then when love returns we see a complete 180 in hate and hes apologetic and loving once again. Another way to tell if an interpretation is correct is if it is true in real life. DMV's interpretation happens occasionaly but not all the time. So why would they write a song with a meaning thats not neccessarily true? And you can say no one knows but they knew when they wrote it so there must be just one meaning. And its pretty obvious what that meaning is.
I mean I know alot of songs are open to interpretation by the listener. But I cant see this as being one of them. It seems pretty straight forward ya know?
I mean I know alot of songs are open to interpretation by the listener. But I cant see this as being one of them. It seems pretty straight forward ya know?
who are any of you to say that DMV's interpretation is wrong?.they can interpret it anyway they feel is right....so sto saying there is no wrong answer..but then turning around and claiming that DMV was wrong please :/
who are any of you to say that DMV's interpretation is wrong?.they can interpret it anyway they feel is right....so sto saying there is no wrong answer..but then turning around and claiming that DMV was wrong please :/
Actually, I like DMV's interpretation
who are you to say he/she got the song meaning wrong.
you don't know. No one does.
Songs have different meanings to different people, which is what makes them so awesome in the first place
I can know thats the wrong interpretation because nothing in the song would make you think that. Its a pretty simple and obvious interpretation. And your right some songs are open for interpretation but some are just obvious. This being one of them. Its not about two different people, its about love and hate they are just personified. And when love is gone hate is there. You can gather that because of what hate is up to while love is gone. Then when love returns we see a complete 180 in hate and hes apologetic and loving once again. Another...
I can know thats the wrong interpretation because nothing in the song would make you think that. Its a pretty simple and obvious interpretation. And your right some songs are open for interpretation but some are just obvious. This being one of them. Its not about two different people, its about love and hate they are just personified. And when love is gone hate is there. You can gather that because of what hate is up to while love is gone. Then when love returns we see a complete 180 in hate and hes apologetic and loving once again. Another way to tell if an interpretation is correct is if it is true in real life. DMV's interpretation happens occasionaly but not all the time. So why would they write a song with a meaning thats not neccessarily true? And you can say no one knows but they knew when they wrote it so there must be just one meaning. And its pretty obvious what that meaning is.
And you, rloyd, are Ignorance personified
And you, rloyd, are Ignorance personified
haha okay man
haha okay man
youre right rloyd
youre right rloyd
I mean I know alot of songs are open to interpretation by the listener. But I cant see this as being one of them. It seems pretty straight forward ya know?
I mean I know alot of songs are open to interpretation by the listener. But I cant see this as being one of them. It seems pretty straight forward ya know?
Dude no ones interpretation of a song is wrong. It's the person's image of the song and they should hear the song that way. You arrogant fool.
Dude no ones interpretation of a song is wrong. It's the person's image of the song and they should hear the song that way. You arrogant fool.
who are any of you to say that DMV's interpretation is wrong?.they can interpret it anyway they feel is right....so sto saying there is no wrong answer..but then turning around and claiming that DMV was wrong please :/
who are any of you to say that DMV's interpretation is wrong?.they can interpret it anyway they feel is right....so sto saying there is no wrong answer..but then turning around and claiming that DMV was wrong please :/
Yeah I agree, songs can be interpreted any way the listener wants. I'm pretty sure it's about Mike Vick and his dog fighting.
Yeah I agree, songs can be interpreted any way the listener wants. I'm pretty sure it's about Mike Vick and his dog fighting.