Micro evolution is not a fact. It's a well supported theory. Scientific tests have proven this, as well as disproved it. So while most scientists do indeed believe there's hard evidence that supports it, I'd hold off on calling it factual. Macro evolution, on the other hand, is not well supported. It requires one to believe that an entire isolated species can die off, and years later come back to life in the form of a new species. The gaps in fossil records is precisely why it's not very clear. As for the other things you mentioned regarding the world, nature, life, and why it needs a creator, let me ask you, since your knowledge is so abundant: Where did life originate? Are you under the belief we and this perfectly working universe are all the result of some strange cosmic accident? I ask you to ponder this: reasons.org/resources/apologetics/design_evidences/solar_system_design_20040608.shtml
and then tell me it's all just coincidental.
To Hail Maynard:
The bible has and cannot be disproven. The contradictions you speak of are a result of people's interpretations, much like many of Maynard's lyrics. There's obviously a good bit of reading material out there on this subject. You'd do yourself a favor by starting with a book called "Faith on Trial".
To the mad scientist, Inviltrist:
Micro evolution is not a fact. It's a well supported theory. Scientific tests have proven this, as well as disproved it. So while most scientists do indeed believe there's hard evidence that supports it, I'd hold off on calling it factual. Macro evolution, on the other hand, is not well supported. It requires one to believe that an entire isolated species can die off, and years later come back to life in the form of a new species. The gaps in fossil records is precisely why it's not very clear. As for the other things you mentioned regarding the world, nature, life, and why it needs a creator, let me ask you, since your knowledge is so abundant: Where did life originate? Are you under the belief we and this perfectly working universe are all the result of some strange cosmic accident? I ask you to ponder this: reasons.org/resources/apologetics/design_evidences/solar_system_design_20040608.shtml and then tell me it's all just coincidental.
To Hail Maynard:
The bible has and cannot be disproven. The contradictions you speak of are a result of people's interpretations, much like many of Maynard's lyrics. There's obviously a good bit of reading material out there on this subject. You'd do yourself a favor by starting with a book called "Faith on Trial".