Lyrics for The Hazards of Love 3 (Revenge!) as interpreted by MarcelLionheart

The Hazards of Love 3 (Revenge!) Lyrics
Charlotte:
Father I'm not feeling well, the flowers me you fed
Tasted spoiled for suddenly I find that I am dead
But father don't you fear, your children all are here
Singing oh, the hazards of love

Dawn:
Papa turn the water down, the basin's overflown
The water covers everything and me left all alone
But papa here in death, I have regained my breath
To sing oh, the hazards of love
To sing oh, the hazards of love

Isaiah:
Spare the rod, you'll spoil the child, but I prefer the lash
My sisters drowned and poisoned all and me reduced to ash
And buried in an urn, but father I return
Singing oh, the hazards of love
Singing oh, the hazards of love

The hazards of love
The hazards of love

Interaction
Mail to a friend Send Lyrics to a Friend
Share on Facebook

Stumble It
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us




  • 22 Comments
  • Printer Friendly Lyrics
Aixsponsa
03-10-2009

Rated +1 
The three murdered children of the villain from "The Rake" come back to haunt their father. A beautiful and creepy song.

Log in to reply
a simple wish
03-14-2009

Rated 0 
the children who were murdered by the rake, finally come to haunt their father after his kidnap/rape of margaret. his conscience catching up with him after this whereas before he says "And that's how I came your humble narrator/To be living so easy and free/Expect you think that I should be haunted/But it never really bothers me" in The Rake's Song.

Log in to reply
TheLegionnaire
03-17-2009

Rated 0 
really wish Colin would have sung this one.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
brave2285
03-20-2009

Rated +2 
I like to believe they get to him before he rapes Margaret.

Log in to reply
deathwriter08
03-21-2009

Rated 0 
I smiled when I heard this. I listened to The Rake's Song so much when it was released, and to hear such a great followup to it was really wonderful.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
jGosper
03-22-2009

Rated 0 
I think that, rather than demonic children rising from the dead and killing him (which a couple of my friends seem to think), either

what jfoxx said:
"I felt like this was the Rake's greeting into death. That William had killed him, and the first thing he sees upon dying is all his murdered children, which will be with him for eternity in death. A fitting sentence."

or

His conscience finally catches up with him, and his murdered children's voices drive him insane (and possibly making him commit suicide), thus making it easy for Margaret to escape and be reunited with William/William to rescue Margaret.
'but father I return'
I take 'return' to mean the rake is still in the land of the living when the voice is haunting him.
'But papa here in death'
This could mean that he's joined his children in death, but I think it's just them talking from death, and he is still alive.

So yes, I think that he is still alive in this song, although probably not for much longer. Who knows, he might simply run away in his insanity.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
sedition
03-24-2009

Rated 0 
If my theory is right than the third verse is actually William talking to the Rake in person when he finally catches up with him. Very subtle but it is kind of a big revelation. It ties up the Rake encounter as William takes revenge and saves Margaret.

Check out my comment in "The Queen's Rebuke/The Crossing" where I dabble in the idea that William is the Rake's killed son Isaiah.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
MollyJohnson
03-30-2009

Rated -1 
After reading sedition's comment that William is the Rake's dead son and listening to this song again I expected to hear just a hint of Will's voice in the the son's verse but can't say I did. The first couple times I listened to the cd I had thought the children's ghosts had come back and teleported Margaret to the river, but Will being the son that has returned makes more sense.

Log in to reply
MollyJohnson
03-30-2009

Rated 0 
I'm thinking the music at the beginning sounds like a fight between Will and the Rake... and the children come to help Will defeat their father. The last little bit sounds like the Rake dies. Anyone else hear that?

Log in to reply
karenina
04-01-2009

Rated 0 
I think that this song takes place at the moment when William shows up to save Margaret. I agree with what some others have suggested for this album, that William is Isaiah, and I think that when William shows up, The Rake sees Isaiah and suddenly everything comes back to haunt him. William may even be the one singing the last verse but The Rake hears Isaiah. I don't think the Rake is killed. I just think that he remains hidden away wherever he is and is tormented by what he has done.

Log in to reply
2marinerssurvive
04-08-2009

Rated 0 
Williams music at the beginning of this song makes think that William makes quick work of the Rake and he's meeting his murdered children's souls in the afterlife.

The wanting comes in waves/reprise then is Williams passionate reuniting with Margaret.

And William is not Isaiah, Isaiah was burned, William was found in the reeds of a river. Also it makes sense that this is the Rake's first act in his new life, so it's fairly recently after killing his children.

Log in to reply
3 Replies
blue.painted.tears
04-09-2009

Rated 0 
It's pretty neat they got a children's choir to sing this, but it must have been really disturbing for the children...

Log in to reply
orypeci
04-26-2009

Rated 0 
This is the most awesome idea.

Log in to reply
salgueira
05-03-2009

Rated 0 
I also don't think that William is Isaiah, he seemed pretty definitely dead, beaten to death then burnt? Surely unsurvivable. It'd also make the Rake a bit old, and perhaps past the age of rakish activities. Then again, he was married at 21, so maybe not.

Originally thought it was the Rake's children suddenly appear and haunt him just as he's about to rape Margaret (they were his 'hazards of love' as he just wanted lots of sex, no babies), and he subsequently goes insane and kills himself, or at least is incapacitated so that William is able to break in and rescue her. But now... actually, the idea that William fights him and kills him, then he gets to spend all eternity as a ghost in the company of his vengeful children... ooh. I think that would be a worse fate. Creepy, creepy use of a children's choir, all very discordant and sinister, and are those squeaking taps on Dawn's verse? *shiver*

Log in to reply
1 Reply
jackasher
05-04-2009

Rated 0 
"Spare the rod, you'll spoil the child, but I prefer the lash"

Any ideas on what is meant by this? Dawn and Charlotte seem to express a sort of sarcastic naivete (Papa, we died on accident, but don't worry, we're back!) whereas Isaiah is clearly aware he and his sisters were murdered (also evident in the Rake's Song). As such, I think this line might be different than the preceding openers by Dawn and Charlotte. I am thinking it could be some sort of threat to his father that in death his father is going to get it. I guess it could also be a reference to his father beating him, but that's no fun.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
SkylinePigeon
05-06-2009

Rated 0 
The line that connects William and Isaiah is in the Queen's Rebuke - "he was a baby abandoned, entombed in a CRADLE OF CLAY." The clay part is the kicker--what kind of cradle would be made of clay? None that I can think of... what is made of clay? Urns... things where you would put ashes... ashes of burnt children perhaps? We'll never know unless Colin comes out and says it, but I think the theory is a sound one and I personally believe it, although two burned children in one Decemberists album is not outside of the realm of possibility. :P

Remember the Queen is magic and has special powers, I don't think reviving William/bringing him back to life is outside the realm of possibility.

Log in to reply
3 Replies
daedalusbrahms
05-07-2009

Rated 0 
to me the idea of the cradle of clay being isaiah's urn is just too cool not to be true...and too much of a coincidence that the queen would mention the cradle's composition. i also figure if she can give william the form of a fawn, then she could have brought him back from the ashes.

thanks, someone, for mentioning that the rake was the villain who kidnaps margaret...for some reason it didn't occur to me, and now it ties the two stories together so nicely! how brilliant is this album anyway...

Log in to reply
kaun83
06-24-2009

Rated 0 
Has anyone considered that William might actually be The Rake? From the Hazards of Love 1, we are introduced to William as a shapeshifter. Perhaps this symbolizes his duality of good and evil. The relationship between him and Margaret is certainly lustful, with them immediately having sex and her becoming pregnant. In the Wanting Comes in Waves, he makes a deal with his adopted mother, the Queen (possibly the Devil?), to have one last night with Margaret, to which she agrees (knowing well that babies will get in the way of his sexual desires). The next song, we are introduced to the Rake (unnamed) and we are left unclear regarding the identity of his wife. I suspect that the Rake is William several years in the future, after the babies from his sexual escapades have severely cramped his style, so he has decided to "divest" his burden by murdering his children. His wife, Margaret, died in childbirth and was transported to the other side of Annan Water (symbolizing death, like the River Styx). The rest of the story revolves around an internal struggle where William fights between his inherent good/evil.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
scarletmagnolia
08-28-2009

Rated 0 
Thinking generally about this topic, rather than specifically...
Is it up to the person who feels "wronged" to punish and torment and haunt? Or would the person who did "wrong" have paid for their "crime" on their own terms? I went through an experience where I did wrong and paid dearly on my own. Then the people who felt "wronged" decided it was up to them to teach me a lesson.

Yes, the rotten deeds you do in life will come back to haunt you. You will pay for them (I would never think it was up to me to make someone pay or teach them a lesson, I simply think naturally their conscience will catch up with them). Like William murdering his babies, some people victimize the hearts of people who love them. They rape their souls and laugh. I would never seek revenge.

My blood is on your hands and I forgive you.

Log in to reply
1 Reply
dlogue15
12-02-2009

Rated 0 
The way that I think of this song is that the song starts with a fight between William and The Rake but The Rake is too strong. Then right as The Rake is about to kill William, the ghosts of his three murdered children come back. The three ghost begin to attack The Rake while mocking him the whole time and then eventually kill him. It doesn't make William look good but the only reason I can think of for the ghosts to come would be if The Rake were about to kill William.

Log in to reply
AidanDies
01-05-2010

Rated +1 
I think William could be Isaiah. If it's the Rake's imagination as he's dying, and at the beginning of the song it's William killing him. If his daughters came to haunt him he could be scared and expecting enough to imagine Isaiah. Then he dies and is stuck with all three rather than two, and it makes all the rest more interesting, with the queen having resurrected Isaiah from ash ;)

Log in to reply




  • Add Your Comments
What does this song mean to you?

You must be logged in to post your comments.

Feel free to create an account with us, or log in with your existing account, to start adding your comments to songs.





Popular
Top:   Lyrics, Artists, Albums
Random:   Lyric, Artist, Album

Your Ad Here