this song is on the Central Park Concert CD - I believe he played this with Warren Haynes. Originally composed by Neil Young. Obviously refers to Hernando Cortez, the Spaniard who conquered Mexico, but on a deeper level it refers to a loss of innocence ("Hate was just a legend/And war was never known" until Cortez arrived). Not typical Dave, it almost has a Guns 'N Roses ring to it, but a great song.

Why post it if its not a Dave Matthews Band Song?

I think this is a beautiful song, and they do a great job of performing it - I wish I could have been at that Central Park concert! Thanks for posting it, I had no idea who originally wrote it.

Dave Matthews and Warren Haynes do an amazing version of the song. Definitely a cover done justice.
I like the loss of innocence angle you interpret it with, majii, but i see it more as a general anti-violence song. "But they built up with their bare hands / What we still can’t do today." These lines signify the achievements of ancient civilizations, which were ruined and destroyed by the more 'advanced' imperial nations.

I like it alot as well. I think Dave likes it mainly because it has very similar themes to "Don't Drink the Water", what with the whole conquerors wrongly taking land from natives and killing them and what not.

This song is saying, things aren't always as they seem to be. I say this because apparently Hernando Cortez came to mexico and made the people there at the time beleive he was a great god and demanded sacrafices, gifts, ect. But in reality he wasnt a god, and when he had the faith and trust of the civilization, he had his men kill everyone living there so he could eventually take over the land. So I agree with deathbear on that it is similar to "Don't Drink the Water" (except its Neil's song, not Dave's), on it is about war, killing, and taking land. But, the overall message of the song, I feel is completly different.

This song is saying, things aren't always as they seem to be. I say this because apparently Hernando Cortez came to mexico and made the people there at the time beleive he was a great god and demanded sacrafices, gifts, ect. But in reality he wasnt a god, and when he had the faith and trust of the civilization, he had his men kill everyone living there so he could eventually take over the land. So I agree with deathbear on that it is similar to "Don't Drink the Water" (except its Neil's song, not Dave's), on it is about war, killing, and taking land. But, the overall message of the song, I feel is completly different.

This song is saying, things aren't always as they seem to be. I say this because apparently Hernando Cortez came to mexico and made the people there at the time beleive he was a great god and demanded sacrafices, gifts, ect. But in reality he wasnt a god, and when he had the faith and trust of the civilization, he had his men kill everyone living there so he could eventually take over the land. So I agree with deathbear on that it is similar to "Don't Drink the Water" (except its Neil's song, not Dave's), on it is about war, killing, and taking land. But, the overall message of the song, I feel is completly different.

This song is a bit confusing. The Aztec empire was based on expansion by war. The temples were built by thousands of slaves who would later be sacrificed upon them. I can see the pity for what was lost but it really wasa rather terrible, no matter how the song portrays it.

great cover song great dvd and concert amazing band

Actually, most of that post by HamiltonInches is incorrect. Mexica (Aztec) slaves were not slaves by the standards that we know them. Their children were born free, they were allowed to own possesions including other slaves, and they could not be sold without their consent. Only slaves that were considered incorrigible by an authority were sold to be sacrificed and they numbered few. The ceremony of sacrifice was very sacred and only continued through ignorance. Hernando Cortez and other spaniards stopped the act of sacrificing to gods but murdered over 15 million natives to greed. War by expansion, what society has not practiced this? So the song, although phonetically pleasant, is also somewhat acurate.

Just to back up entrodamc on this one; I love the song and am taking a college class that involves a trip to Mexico and a reading in the book "Triumphs and Tragedy" by Ramon Ruiz. While they have both noble and ignoble aspects to their society, I see a lot of the noble in them. They were an empire based on expansion by war, but unlike most empires of that sort, they did not force their conquered people to adhere to any rule or to change their customs to match the Aztec. They expanded using war, but once in a time of peace they learned the culture of the people they conquered and became very peaceful and civilized, to an extent. What proved to be their downfall was their benevolence- unlike the Spanish, or many other conquering nations, they did not subjugate the people they conquered-- instead they imposed a tributary system allowing the other tribes to keep their culture and cities and just pay the Aztec. Cortez played off of this and fought Montezuma with only 600 Spaniards but 30,000 allied Indians. The one ignoble aspect of the Aztec civilization was their Human Sacrifice, which sounds barbaric but has several asterisks. It started because during their time of expansion, they were suffering from an extended drought and many Aztec were dying. They sacrificed themselves to their Gods and soon after the drought ended and they won a great military battle. They saw this as a sign of the Gods being pleased and continued the practice until the Spanish came. (This practice was also prevalent in most of Central America, including the island that Columbus first landed on). The reason I include the asterisks is because while barbaric, the reason the Spanish felt justified in their pillaging was due to their superior religion; they had just kicked out all Jews and Moslems from Spain. This does not add up with their character, as almost all of the first settlers in Mexico were the greedy or criminals of Spain, left with no wealth or land in Spain and bent on becoming wealthy and prosperous in the New World. Using their religion to appease their conscious and extend their domain, they reaped the benefits and enslaved all of the Indians-- you speak of the Indians having slaves, but as mentioned above they were not slaves by most standards. The Spanish left all of Mexico enslaved, in the sense that they were forced to work for the Conquistadors and the penalty for leaving their land was death.

Now that we have our little history lesson (which came at the expense of the paper I am trying to write on the subject) I will add my two cents about the song.

I find it completely accurate in that it rings true with the bittersweet sense of loss. To me, it is about the loss of innocence- the people of Mexico had never known disease or poverty or hunger before. As much as there was a caste system, the "wealthy" (in this case, nobles) were not living at the expense of the others. You were assigned a role due to your family history, and you did it, but everyone was well fed and lived in peace. Unlike the song says, war was known, as was hate, as that was what Cortez used to ensnare the rival tribes that resented the Aztec rule.

In reading about this history, I am left wondering how much more they would have accomplished had they not been wiped out by the Spanish. And by wiped out, I mean literally, wiped out. 25 Million people lived in Mexico before the Spanish came, and within 100 years only 1 million were left. This was due to massacres, brutal labor (Most spanish slave-owners were described as brutal and unkind- one even had 6 tribal leaders hung because they did not sweep the path before his arrival) and most of all disease. The interesting note to this- it is also due to their pride. Some tribes forbid their women to give birth, choosing to quietly end their existence as opposed to living under the rule of the Spanish.

That is why I feel the innocence lost and the oppression aspect of the song. Montezuma ended his reign by giving a gift- he hoped to appease Cortez and so sent him two large gold disks. Picture wagon wheels of solid gold, a noble gift to anyone, but to Cortez it showed the wealth that was still to be had. (One other note- the Governor who sent Cortez was actually annoyed by the way Cortez carried himself after being appointed Conquistador- he became full of himself and was irreverent to any authority, and so the Governor had named a successor and was replacing Cortez. Cortez heard of this and left port early, thus keeping his position and not letting his men know of the plan. That is why, upon reaching Mexico, he was able to burn the ships as a motivational tool for his men- he didn't want to go back. That pivotal moment was what prompted everything that happened afterwards.)

As for what they could have accomplished, it is all speculation. The Chinese reached Mexico before the Spanish did, around 1423 or so, and they described it as the most developed culture they had yet discovered. Pottery was as well made as the Chinese, they were adept at Astronomy and were able to build rather large monuments such as the pyramids. Even just the city and palace- the capital of the Aztec Nation was built on a lake, with the inner circle perfectly placed in the middle for the nobility and each successive circle a slightly lower caste. It was both well designed and well built and beautiful. With all of this, had the Chinese maintained trading relations and given them gunpowder or other advances, they would have been able to hold their own against the most of the Western Nations that were to come. (The Chinese aspect of this story is related in the book 1421, which is about the massive fleets sent out by the Chinese in the year 1421- they discovered the New World nearly 70 years before Columbus, but while they were at sea the Emperor of China died and his son decided that all travel must cease, going so far as to erase most record of the voyages. He left all of the ships to rot in the harbor, forbidding any ships to be built large enough to travel overseas, and thus another empire was thwarted from developing.)

Wow that's impressive... though I would not expect any sort of historical accuracy from Neil Young he said this was from a dream he had, not anything he read. I think Cortez was a ruthless murderer but who's to say the Aztecs were any better?

It never ceases to amaze me how far certain people will go to make "whitey" look like evil incarnate and yet will gloss over other civilization’s cultures and practices as if they were the best things in the world. On this very page, human sacrifice, the caste system, imperialistic warfare and slavery are condoned, explained away and even spoken of admiringly, all in the name of looking fondly upon the Aztecs and scorning the Spanish.

And I bet most of you regularly rant about America and its “imperial war for oil.”

Dave Matthews is a naïve idealist, as is the author of this song and almost all of you. Brutality and evil know no skin color, and the truth of the matter is that the Aztecs were every bit as vicious and blood-thirsty as the Spanish that conquered them, probably moreso.

“Hate was just a legend, war was never known, people worked together and they lifted many stones…”

All of this is a bold-faced lie, except for the people working together to lift many stones. That part is true because those people were slaves working under the crack of the whip. Hate is a part of human nature, and it never has, nor will it ever go away. As far as the war being never known part, it’s all bullshit because the Aztecs built their EMPIRE (yes, empire, as in IMPERIALISM) on the bodies of their neighbors.

What is my point? My point is to point out the total hypocrisy of the “college-educated history students” on this page, who completely gloss over and give a free pass to the Aztecs for their barbarism and brutality while condemning white people for doing the same thing. When will a liberal condone, even speak lovingly, of slavery, genocide, murderous religious fanaticism, human sacrifice, caste systems and imperialistic warfare? When they’re being committed by NON-WHITES. Then it’s all perfectly fine and dandy! Liberals will let you get away with anything, as long as you’re not white and part of a different civilization.

But Cortez? ZOMG, he was a murderous, evil man! Satan incarnate! A killer!

The bottom line: if you’re a college student, learn to READ BETWEEN THE LINES. The truth is, both the Spanish and Aztecs had blood on their hands. Actually no, they didn’t just have blood on their hands – they were both drowning in a sea of it.

On the end to what I wrote above, I meant to write that if you're a college student, learn to READ BETWEEN THE LINES, not just the text itself.

Oh, and I don't buy for a minute that Mexico and South America had never known poverty, hunger or disease before the Spanish came. Maybe some of the rich rulers of the Aztecs had never known those things, but poverty, disease and hunger are universal and eternal. Every people on the face of this world has experienced it at one time or another, and every civilization in the world will experience them again.

Now you people are comparing the Spanish to gods, somehow supernaturally creating and inflicting things upon the Aztec that had NEVER existed before! ZOMG!

There’s more bullshit on this page than there is in a cattle ranch.

This song is so good and also amazing solo in the middle parts of the lyrics.

dave is good, but no one can play it like neil

To jimboa18

For yelling at "college educated students" you sure don't make too good of an argument. While you have a valid point that Aztecs, as well as many other cultures, committed acts just as vile as Cortez, we ourselves do not tolerate or condone them. People when talking about Cortez are talking ABOUT CORTEZ, not the Aztecs. Their ways do not make them evil, cruel, or hateful, just as it does not justify Cortez's actions. No one doubts that the Aztecs did what we consider foul deeds, but these deeds where not done out of spite or hate, rather they were integral parts of their society and religion. To say "Aztecs were every bit as vicious and blood-thirsty as the Spanish that conquered them, probably moreso" is a hasty conclusion. The Aztecs killed for territory, not out of hate, but for control of resources. Sacrifices, while certainly not Christian, were not evil, rather they were practices of religion, and considered vital to their survival. They paid their pagan gods in blood out of necessity, just as we pay at the grocery store for food. To present the Aztecs in such a light is a very one-sided approach, and is just as poor an argument as calling Cortez an murderous evil whitey.

And while its true that the Aztecs probably faced disease before the Spanish, they probably never faced diseases of such severity as those the Spanish brought with them. Not to mention that their immune systems while probably resistant to local strains of such a disease, where not prepared for a completely different strain of the disease. You can't tell me that a disease cultured in Mexico would be the same as one from Spain. That is why disease had such a devastating impact on them, much like the indians when they were exposed to smallpox. Therefore they didn't know disease before the white man came partly because any diseases they faced were not as devastating or severe.

Where did you get the idea that EVERYONE condones what the Aztecs did, and not EVERYONE refers to Cortez as the anti-christ, and finally where did you get the notion that we compare the spanish to Gods. You are just jumping on people.

In conclusion, yes the song doesn't speak truth, but its a song. If songs were just boring plain truth, nobody would listen to them. Both the Aztecs and Cortez did nasty things, but neither was evil or hateful. The Aztecs did terrible things, but it was part of their lifestyle. I'm not saying they were innocent, just not the blood-thirsty killers YOU portray them as. Cortez was a greedy man who killed a lot of people, he was no saint either.